A place for community members to contribute product ideas and suggestions.

Transaction webhooks need x_cust_id, x_subscription_id, etc, like Silent Posts

Status: New
by on ‎08-06-2018 12:13 AM

The identifying information that's included in Silent Posts (x_cust_id, x_subscription_id, etc) should always be in webhook transactions, if not just everything in Silent Posts. I know about refId but that's of no use to companies using ARB for recurring billing, which is 99% of our transactions.

This is making my migration to Webhooks difficult. Your support staff has obviously been instructed to push everyone to webhooks if they're using Silent Post right now but the glaring omissions of functionality in webhooks is just absurd.

The only solution is to query the Authnet API for information on the transaction ("getTransactionDetailsRequest"). The response that comes back from that query is very detailed. That detailed response should just be webhook. Why the heck not? Come on now.

on ‎05-12-2020 04:56 AM

Get the Spotify access freely by the Oliva wales